RE: Review Period Reminder
Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 <[email protected]> Tue, 4 May 2004 15:42:35 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi James, I like to second Charlie's comments below. Madjid -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Charles E.Perkins Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 12:18 PM To: James Kempf Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder Hello folks, James Kempf wrote: > > 4) Is this a protocol document or a information document? If it is > > info, then probably keywords (MUST; SHOULD; MAY, etc) shouldn't > > be used. > > I'll ask Allison. I've heard two stories on this, one that an informational > or experimental document may have such normative text and others that it > shouldn't. The doc is really just informational. I was under the very strong impression that the document was intended for publication as Experimental, and in that case it seems clear that the 2119 keywords SHOULD be used.