FW: Review Period Reminder

Hello James,
Sorry for late comments. I was out last week. 
BTW, I have couple of minor editorial comments on the 
latest draft. Should't we change the third sentence of section 
6.3 to " Since establishing an IPSec security 
association between MN and AR(not ARS) ..."?
Also, there is some extra "." before the begining of 
third para of page 9.
Regards,
Ajoy 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: 5/3/04 5:18 PM
Subject: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder

Folks,

As a reminder, we are now in a review period for changes to the CTP and
CARD
drafts in response to IESG and AD comments. The review expires this
Thurs.
May 6 (apologies for the wrong weekday on the original email, May 6 is
Thurs. not Tue.).

We have already received two sets of comments to the list, one on CTP
and
one on CARD. If you have any comments, please submit them before Thurs.
Remember that at this point we're looking for specific text that needs
changing and suggestions for what text should replace or augment it.

The drafts are at:

http://www.geocities.com/kempf42/draft-ietf-seamoby-card-protocol-07.txt
http://www.geocities.com/kempf42/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-09.txt
http://www.geocities.com/kempf42/draft-ietf-seamoby-iana-00.txt


            jak



_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby