A few questions on draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-10.txt
"Jee J.Z." <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:06:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.seamoby |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <016201c47fc5$7ccfe220$68892090@grouse> |
Dear authors, I've just read the draft and am new to the list, so sorry if these questions have already been talked about: 1. Last paragraph of 2.5.3: For predictive handover, the pAR SHOULD keep track of the CTAR sequence number and cache the CTD message until receiving either a CTDR message for the MN's previous IP address from the "pAR", indicating that the context transfer was successful, or until "CT_MAX_HANDOVER_TIME" expires. ... Should the "pAR" be "nAR"? Should the "CT_MAX_HANDOVER_TIME" be "CT_MAX_TRANSFER_TIME"? (according to section 4) 2. Second paragraph of 2.5.6 ... pAR drops the context after "CTP_MAX_TRANSFER_TIME". The sequence number is not used in reactive transfer. Should the "CTP_MAX_TRANSFER_TIME" be "CT_MAX_TRANSFER_TIME"? (according to section 4) 3. Second paragraph of 3.2 ... The initial retransmission occurs after a "CTP_REQUEST_RETRY" wait period.Retransmissions MUST be made with exponentially increasing wait intervals (doubling the wait each time). CTAR messages should be retransmitted until either a response (which might be an error) has been obtained, or until "CTP_RETRY_MAX" seconds after the initial transmission. Should the "CTP_REQUEST_RETRY" be "CT_REQUEST_RETRY"? Should the "CTP_RETRY_MAX" be "CT_RETRY_MAX"? (according to section 4) 4. Section 5 Should there be a subsection describing the scenario discussed in 2.1.1(Mobile controled, CTAR is sent from the MN to the pAR)? Or do I miss anything obvious? Thanks, Jee