Re: draft-kwatsen-reverse-ssh-01 submission for review

Eliot Lear <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag,gmane.ietf.secsh
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jeff,

On 6/9/11 4:51 AM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> Interestingly, this role reversal -- allowing the SSH server to open
> sessions and run commands on the SSH client, requires no change to the
> SSH protocol at all.  It simply requires that the client sit around
> waiting for a channel-open request from the server and accept it when it
> comes around.  This is exactly the sort of situation in which it is
> appropriate to behave contrary to the SHOULD in RFC4254 section 6.1.

This is where my head has been on this issue.  Why isn't this simply a
matter of going contrary to the SHOULD (which I always thought was too
strong)?

Eliot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.