Re: draft-kwatsen-reverse-ssh-01 submission for review
Eliot Lear <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag,gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jeff, On 6/9/11 4:51 AM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > Interestingly, this role reversal -- allowing the SSH server to open > sessions and run commands on the SSH client, requires no change to the > SSH protocol at all. It simply requires that the client sit around > waiting for a channel-open request from the server and accept it when it > comes around. This is exactly the sort of situation in which it is > appropriate to behave contrary to the SHOULD in RFC4254 section 6.1. This is where my head has been on this issue. Why isn't this simply a matter of going contrary to the SHOULD (which I always thought was too strong)? Eliot