Re: [saag] Support for ECDSA and SHA-2 (SHA-256) in the SSHFP record
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 20:54 -0400, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi Damien, > > On 30. 7. 2011, at 14:21, Damien Miller wrote: > > > Thanks for starting work on this - SSHFP records for ECDSA keys were on > > my TODO list, but I haven't yet got around to them. > > > I briefly skimmed your draft - one question I have is whether it is > > better to roll up all the ECDSA key types under one SSHFP RR type. > > It would be quite ugly to have to allocate SSHFP RR type numbers for > > each possible ECDSA curve type, but using a single one might make > > exploitation of SHA256 preimage attacks easier. Before we go any further, it's probably best to make it clear in advance that we are _not_ talking about RR types at all. SSHFP is and continues to be a single RR type. What we are talking about is values for the "algorithm" field in the SSHFP RR data. It's a bit late now, but if we'd made the algorithm field a string containing the SSH public key algorithm name, we wouldn't be having this discussion now. :-( > I thought that secsh was concluded, but it seems that the mailing list > is still up. Ccing there as well. The WG did conclude, but this list is still active and is the appropriate forum for discussing changes or enhancements to SSH or related protocols. I'm CC'ing this there, and moving saag to bcc only so that people there see my first comment above. -- Jeff