Re: TLS considering an rc4-die-die-die draft
[email protected] (Niels Möller)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Damien Miller <[email protected]> writes: > OpenSSH will turn RC4 off soon - we're just trying to figure out how > to do it gently enough that working configurations don't suddenly break > yet firmly enough that people actually move to a better cipher. What breakage do you expect? Servers configured to support no other cipher than arcfour, probably from some (possibly misguided) performance argument? > We'll be recommending [email protected] as a replacment > where both ends upport it. If I have understood correctly, openssh uses the original definition of chacha with 64-bits each for nonce and counter, while recent ietf drafts specify a 96-bit nonce and only 32 bits for the counter. Is that right? I think support for chacha-poly1305 is highly desirable, but it seems a bit messy with specifications still in flux. Best regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.