Re: Proposal and intent to implement "dsa-sha2-256" SSH key algorithm
[email protected] (Niels Möller)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
denis bider <[email protected]> writes: > I therefore suggest a new SSH key algorithm, dsa-sha2-256, which > cherry-picks from FIPS 186-3 the following two options: > > L = 2048, N = 256 > L = 3072, N = 256 > > In other words: > - modulus size is either 2048 or 3072 > - subgroup size is 256 bits > - hash function is SHA2-256 Makes sense to me. Last time I looked at doing larger DSA, I had trouble finding any test vectors. Does FIPS-186 include any now? > I choose the name "dsa-sha2-256", rather than a suffixed name > ("[email protected]") for the following reasons: I don't quite agree, but I don't have any strong objection either. I think it would be nice with an (informational?) RFC spelling out those details, and providing a few test vectors. Any then a non-suffixed name is fully appropriate (and as far as I remember, the ietf requirements for a new ssh algorithm name are pretty weak). Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.