RE: New version of rsa-sha2-512 draft posted: no more DSA
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B58ACD@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> |
denis bider <[email protected]> writes: >I was wondering how much SSH there is on embedded devices. I'm glad to hear >you have that covered. :-) A surprising amount, a lot of stuff that used to be done via a serial console just got wrapped in SSH when the devices were Internet-enabled. It means you can keep using the same tools you've always used (TLS-protected web interfaces may look cool on consumer devices, and there's some use coming in SCADA, but you can't script them or manage them easily with standard tools). The downside is that I've got workarounds for 15-year-old implementation bugs still active in my code, because the software gets updated as infrequently as the hardware, and the standards-conformance test for any SSH implementation is "will putty connect to it?". OK, drifting off-topic there :-). Hmm, I wonder if it'd be worth doing a profile of SSH for embedded use? It'd certainly help clear some interop headaches, and give the SCADA folks a target to aim for. Peter.