RE: Updated RSA SHA-2 draft / New draft: SSH Extension Negotiation
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B59673@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> |
denis bider <[email protected]> writes: >(1) I have uploaded a new version of the RSA SHA-2 draft: > >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rsa-dsa-sha2-256-02 Has anyone else implemented this? I've dropped in some quick partial support for it, and I can't see why it wouldn't work transparently to replace the existing form, but being able to test against someone else would be good. Hmm, just saw an issue, I used "ssh-rsa-sha2..." instead of rsa-..., should the new names also have the "ssh-" prefix to match existing usage? As I see it the name has to identify the format used, "ssh-", and the signature algorithm, "rsa-sha...", having just the latter makes it difficult to specify other signature formats. Peter.