RE: DH group exchange (Re: SSH key algorithm updates)
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B5A9BC@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> |
[email protected] <[email protected]> writes: >That said, I do not find any FIPS or NIST documents talking about Lim-Lee >primes for use in FIPS certified systems. Sure, because it post-dates the original NIST docs that specified the keygen. The idea is that if you need FIPS validation you use the NIST generation method, if you don't, you use any method that works, one obvious example being Lim-Lee (same result but much quicker because you're generating lots of small primes, particularly useful if you want to generate a new DH parameter set on each handshake). Since the verification process for both 186 and Lim-Lee generated values is identical, you can verify the keys either way. So the spec would cover both NIST and non-NIST options at the same time, depending on implementer preference. Peter.