RE: Binary packet protocol rethink

Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.secsh
Message-ID <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B95E88@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
I wrote:

>and then we can debate whether encrypting the length hinders those
>countermeasures

Sorry, missing negation, that should be "not encrypting the length".

(See also my post to the TLS list today on how to progress this issue,
unfortunately the debate is by now spread across three lists, SSH, TLS, and
CFRG).

Peter.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.