RE: Binary packet protocol rethink
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B95E88@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> |
I wrote: >and then we can debate whether encrypting the length hinders those >countermeasures Sorry, missing negation, that should be "not encrypting the length". (See also my post to the TLS list today on how to progress this issue, unfortunately the debate is by now spread across three lists, SSH, TLS, and CFRG). Peter.