Re: [Curdle] Call for Adoption
"Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Migault <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks for the suggestion. I think it falls into the scope of the WG. Thank you. > The question I would have is whether it would make sense to extend the > document to the crypto suites others than DH - i.e. encryption mac. I am not sure if this is the best course. There are other SSH drafts also in draft by other authors https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ssh-ext-info https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rsa-dsa-sha2-256 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bjh21-ssh-ed25519 which are working in this area of SSH already. > This would result in a document providing cryptographic > recommendations for SSH and have this document regularly updated as > crypto evolves. Any opinion ? Coming up with RFC 4250bis, RFC 4242bis, RFC 4253bis, and RFC 4254bis would be a lot of work and keeping them regularly updated would be non-trivial. I am open to suggestions for additions or changes to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baushke-ssh-dh-group-sha2 as long as the ietf-SSH group wants that to happen. Does any one else have any opinions on this topic? -- Mark