Re: draft-baushke-ssh-dh-group-sha2-01 (was Re: DH group exchange)
denis bider <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Mark, appreciated, and agreed. Given these recommendations, we should consider what to do about hmac-sha2-384. In RFC 6668, we mentioned it, but did not actually define it. It seems that there is now a need to define hmac-sha2-384 formally. It has the advantage of 16 fewer bytes being used for MAC. On the other hand, I'm not sure that there's a need for rsa-sha2-384. I don't see advantages compared to rsa-sha2-512, which the current draft defines