RE: AEAD in ssh
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C0025E@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> |
Damien Miller <[email protected]> writes: >Peek-a-Boo makes clear that encrypted lengths aren't *sufficient*, but I >don't think it's so clear that they aren't necessary or useful. I assume you're referring to this subheading: Hiding packet lengths is not sufficient. This is followed by: We initiate a study of classifiers that do not directly use fine-grained features such as individual packet lengths. The VNG++ classifier just mentioned uses only “coarse” information, including overall time, total bandwidth, and size of bursts. In fact, we provide a naiive Bayes classifier that uses only the total bandwidth for training and testing, yet still achieves greater than 98% accuracy at k = 2 and 41% accuracy at k = 128. So neither of the two classifiers they discuss use plaintext packet length information even though it's readily available. They never really discuss whether it's useful or not since they're totally ignoring it, because their analysis doesn't need it in order to work. Peter.