Re: rsa-sha2-256/512: handling of incorrect signature encoding
Matt Johnston <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:04:16AM +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote: > I was thinking of it in an opportunistic-upgrade sense, for example for PGP > and S/MIME the mandatory algorithm is SHA-1 but if you receive a message > signed with SHA-2 you can switch to that because the client will be able to > process it. So if you see ecdsa-sha2... or rsa-sha2... in the keyex then you The pubkey signature could have come from a ssh-agent (only supporting rsa-sha1) that's elsewhere to the SSH client. Cheers, Matt