Re: Async rekey?
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> Sat, 6 Aug 2022 11:34:22 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SY4PR01MB62514DBFEBC0FEDDA3D102C4EE619@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> |
Simon Tatham <[email protected]> writes: >Another risk is exposure of the session keys from the implementation's memory >[...] These are being used in things like IEDs - the other IED, power grid control elements - where there's nothing much on the system to attack, and availability is vastly more important than a hypothetical problem of keys being stolen, thus the don't-risk-data-corruption-via-a-rekey approach. Even if someone were to figure out how to steal a key, they're only really being used for integrity protection (of control messages), and any attacker who can extract the keys, delete legitimate messages, and inject their own fake ones in their place already has capabilities way outside the threat model. Peter.