Re: An additional-auth mechanism for SSH to protect against scanning/probing attacks
Mouse <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:25:42 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> After some off-list discussions I've given up on trying to use > existing keying material for the pre-auth, [...] here's the updated > form. Is it just me, or do other people see what looks like missing text? Here's what I'm seeing: > * In order to encourage adoption by implementers of embedde > re minimal effort to retrofit to existing SSH > implementations, both because embedded systems using SSH are > frequent targets and because these systems often only have minimal ... > of client and server ID strings and adds a simple challenge/response > to them, preventing the exchange of any SSH hand > ords any actual SSH protocol messages, unless the pre- > authentication succeeds. It does this by adding a random challenge > in the Comment field of the server's SSH ID, with the client ... > It is recommended that imp > thentication attempts, throttling back responses if too many pre- > authentication failures occur in a given time interval. To further > confound attackers, servers may in addition opt to continue with an ... /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [email protected] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B