Re: SSH operations modelled in YANG
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:08:29 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "tom" == tom petch <[email protected]> writes: tom> I see this approach as fatally flawed since IANA-maintained tom> modules and regular ones have a different trajectory and I'm skeptical for an entirely different reason. Is anyone going to manage ssh using netconf anyway, and for example is the way you think about managing ssh for a router or switch even vaguely similar to how you would manage it for a cloud server? Put another way, what's the danger that someone might try and implement this? If that's relatively low, the level of review required is low:-)