Re: sntrup761x25519-sha512
Matt Johnston <[email protected]> Tue, 16 May 2023 14:46:04 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.curdle,gmane.ietf.secsh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2023-05-15 9:40 pm, Simo Sorce wrote: > Is it worth waiting until the final NIST candidates parameters are > published and provide a full set of post quantum resistant algorithms > at that time? > > (Work on how to use those curves can start earlier, but publication > should wait until algorithms are official. sntrup761 doesn't seem to be a candidate any more for NIST standardisation. There's Kyber as the round 3 choice, then some other round 4 candidates [1] Has anyone asked the OpenSSH developers if they have future plans for sntrup761? Cheers, Matt [1] https://csrc.nist.gov/News/2022/pqc-candidates-to-be-standardized-and-round-4