Issues compiling auto_hi classes (and others issues)

Hi!

I'm pretty much new to SFL and I got several general questions about it.

(Question #1)

I didn't succeed in compiling the project auto_hi classes with MS Visual
Studio.  I think that my setup is OK (Crypto++ was compiled with success
etc...).  Everything seems to go well but at the end of the compilation I
obtains:

c:\cvs_home\sfl\smime\alg_libs\sm_rsa\sm_rsa.h(65) : fatal error C1083:
Cannot open include file: 'aglobal.h': No such file or directory
sm_rsa.cpp
c:\cvs_home\sfl\smime\alg_libs\sm_rsa\sm_rsa.h(65) : fatal error C1083:
Cannot open include file: 'aglobal.h': No such file or directory
Generating Code...
Compiling...
sm_tstdlib.c
c:\cvs_home\sfl\smime\alg_libs\sm_rsa\sm_tstdlib.c(20) : fatal error C1083:
Cannot open include file: 'aglobal.h': No such file or directory

I know it's because I don't have RSA BSAFE library...  But my question is:
Do we really need RSA BSAFE to compile this project (auto_hi.exe)?  Can we
use SFL (with all the S/MIME functionnalities) without RSA BSAFE?  At first
I used to think that everything should be fine only with Crypto++ (this lib
seems to implements all the functionnalities needed for S/MIME), but now I'm
wondering.  So if there is a way to use only Crypto++ with SFL:  How to
configure SFL only to use Crypto++?  Which files or compilation flags do we
need to add / modify?


(Question #2)

>From my understanding of SFL - CML - SRL now it looks like CML (v1.9) is
only used to provide Cert Path Validation and High Level access to "the real
implementation of a cert store".  The Storage is handled by SRL.  I got some
questions concerning CML vs SRL:

2.1 Is there a way to use Crypto++ (instead of RSA BSAFE) for cryptographic
function needed by CML for path processing?  How?

2.2 Is there a way to use SFL with CML (for path validation processing and
high level access to storage) with SRL (for storage only) and finally with a
custom-made CallBack_Function (only for certificate retrieval).  To be more
precise:  Let's say that someone want to use SRL to store the certificates
but he don't want to use the default retrieval using a LDAP_Client provided
library.  What he want to do is more:

I- SFL needs someone's certificate to encrypt
II- SFL calls CML to ask for certificate
III- CML calls SRL to ask for certificate
IV- SRL don't find the certificate asked for...
V- CML (or SRL at this point?) use the "Custom_Made" CallBack Function to
retrieve the certificate

At step V let's just say that the certificate is not found locally nor it is
available to a LDAP directory.  The certificate can be found at another
place using a Custom_Made function...  I hope you got it.  The question is:
Is it feasible?  How?
I was reading in CML API doc (v1.9) that there are 3 different functions
that can be provided to CM_CreateSessionExt()...  I have kind of a idea
about how to do it but I'm really not sure if it will work (or if CML was
designed for this specific case mentionned above).

Thanks a lot in advance for your answers.  I know there is quite some
questions in this post...

|=========================================
| Simon Blanchet
| Software Designer
|
| Email: [email protected]
|=========================================