RE: EncryptedData support

Piers,

Thank you for your feedback.  You are correct that all instances of
"EnvelopedData" should be "EncryptedData" in Section 7.2.6 of the
sfl_api_v2_0.doc.  We will make those changes prior to the next release of
the SFL API document.

We do not know of anybody that is using the EncryptedData features in the
SFL.  We do not know of anybody using the SFL in a web browser environment.
However, most integrators don't tell us how they are using the SFL, so it is
possible that there are folks who have integrated the SFL into a web browser
environment. 

=========================================== 
John Pawling, [email protected] 
Getronics Government Solutions, LLC 
=========================================== 


-----Original Message-----
From: Piers Chivers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:22 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: EncryptedData support


The document sfl_api_v2_0.doc Section 7.2.6 talks about support for CMS
EncryptedData but the subsequent sections refer to EnvelopedData (Section
7.2.6.3 for example).  I assume these are typos?
 
Is anyone using the EncryptedData features in the SFL?  Additionally, is
anyone successfully using the SFL from a web browser environment?
 
Thanks,
Piers
 
Piers Chivers
Product Architect
Protek Network Security
+44 (0)1270 507800
www.protek.com