Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4666 (4475)

From: Sigtran [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
> Sent: 15 September 2015 00:48
..
> Original Text
> -------------
> The optional SI [7,8] field contains one or more Service
>       Indicators from the values described in the MTP3-User Identity
>       field of the DUPU message.  The absence of the SI parameter in the
>       Routing Key indicates the use of any SI value, excluding of course
>       MTP management.  Where an SI parameter does not contain a multiple
>       of four SIs, the parameter is padded out to 32-byte alignment.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The optional SI [7,8] field contains one or more Service
>       Indicators from the values described in the MTP3-User Identity
>       field of the DUPU message.  The absence of the SI parameter in the
>       Routing Key indicates the use of any SI value, excluding of course
>       MTP management.  Where an SI parameter does not contain a multiple
>       of four SIs, the parameter is padded out to 32-bit alignment.

I'd question the entire statement about padding.
The padding isn't part of the parameter, but exists between parameters.

So something like:
    If the SI parameter does not contain a multiple of four SIs the Length
    will not be a multiple of 4 and there will be pad bytes following the
    parameter.
would be more correct.

	David