Re: Query regarding the sequence message delivery functionality in M3UA layer
Pradeep Kumar <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:53:11 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAZxfpfd=ToGmRXWNDU4NzFUCCu26Re=eiu6Sj1afipWQGGqUQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============0640417308446923132==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c03308d398bf0538aeaea1
--001a11c03308d398bf0538aeaea1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Can someone help with the below query?
re-posting the text again as:
+++++++++++++++++++
I had an query regarding the sequence message delivery functionality in
M3UA layer.
As in the SS7/MTP3 layer there is concept of the controlled re-routing in
case of links status un-availability, the controlled re-routing buffer and
its time controlled procedure ensures that that are messages are delivered
in-sequence. As explained in the RFC section 8.1.1 of T-REC-Q704 as :
*=E2=80=9C**8.1.1 **The objective of the controlled rerouting procedure is =
to
restore the optimal signalling*
*routing and to minimize mis-sequencing of messages. Therefore, controlled
rerouting includes a*
*time-controlled traffic diversion procedure,=E2=80=9D*
Now in case of M3UA the same situation can occur, so do we have an similar
functionality of controlled re-routing available in M3UA/Sigtran as well?
If yes please mentioned the RFC section(I could not find any reference in
RFC on this topic). ?
IF NO, then what is the reasoning behind not having the
controlled re-routing in M3UA/SIGTRAN? Is it so that we don=E2=80=99t need =
such
procedures in IP world and what is the reason for it?
+++++++++++++++++++
Regards,
Pradeep Kumar
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Pradeep Kumar <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I had an query regarding the sequence message delivery functionality in
> M3UA layer.
>
>
>
> As in the SS7/MTP3 layer there is concept of the controlled re-routing in
> case of links status un-availability, the controlled re-routing buffer an=
d
> its time controlled procedure ensures that that are messages are delivere=
d
> in-sequence. As explained in the RFC section 8.1.1 of T-REC-Q704 as :
>
> *=E2=80=9C**8.1.1 **The objective of the controlled rerouting procedure i=
s to
> restore the optimal signalling*
>
> *routing and to minimize mis-sequencing of messages. Therefore, controlle=
d
> rerouting includes a*
>
> *time-controlled traffic diversion procedure,=E2=80=9D *
>
>
>
> Now in case of M3UA the same situation can occur, so do we have an simila=
r
> functionality of controlled re-routing available in M3UA/Sigtran as well?
>
> If yes please mentioned the RFC section(I could not find any reference in
> RFC on this topic). ?
>
> IF NO, then what is the reasoning behind not having the
> controlled re-routing in M3UA/SIGTRAN? Is it so that we don=E2=80=99t nee=
d such
> procedures in IP world and what is the reason for it?
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Pradeep Kumar
>
> *=E2=80=9CThe world needs HQ (Humanity quotient) more than IQ.=E2=80=9D*
>
>
--001a11c03308d398bf0538aeaea1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>Can someone help with the below que=
ry?</div><div><br></div><div>re-posting the text again as:</div><div>++++++=
+++++++++++++</div><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px">I had an query regarding t=
he sequence message delivery functionality in M3UA layer.</p><div style=3D"=
font-size:12.8px"></div><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></p><p style=3D"font-=
size:12.8px"></p><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px">=C2=A0</div><p style=3D"fo=
nt-size:12.8px"></p><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px">As in the SS7/MTP3 layer =
there is concept of the controlled re-routing in case of links status un-av=
ailability, the controlled re-routing buffer and its time controlled proced=
ure ensures that that are messages are delivered in-sequence.=C2=A0 As expl=
ained in the RFC section 8.1.1 of T-REC-Q704 as :</p><div style=3D"font-siz=
e:12.8px"></div><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></p><p style=3D"font-size:12.=
8px"><i>=E2=80=9C</i><b><i><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;font-family:"=
times new roman",serif">8.1.1=C2=A0</span></i></b><i><span style=3D"fo=
nt-size:12pt;font-family:"times new roman",serif">The objective o=
f the controlled rerouting procedure is to restore the optimal signalling</=
span></i></p><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></div><p style=3D"font-size:12=
.8px"></p><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><i><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;fo=
nt-family:"times new roman",serif">routing and to minimize mis-se=
quencing of messages. Therefore, controlled rerouting includes a</span></i>=
</p><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></div><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></p=
><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><i><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;font-family=
:"times new roman",serif">time-controlled traffic diversion proce=
dure,</span>=E2=80=9D</i></p><div style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></div><p style=
=3D"font-size:12.8px"></p><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></p><div style=3D"f=
ont-size:12.8px">=C2=A0</div><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></p><p style=3D"=
font-size:12.8px">Now in case of M3UA the same situation can occur, so do w=
e have an similar functionality of controlled re-routing available in M3UA/=
<span class=3D"gmail-il">Sigtran</span>=C2=A0as well?=C2=A0=C2=A0</p><div s=
tyle=3D"font-size:12.8px"></div><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></p><p style=
=3D"font-size:12.8px;text-indent:0.5in">If yes please mentioned the RFC sec=
tion(I could not find any reference in RFC on this topic). ?</p><div style=
=3D"font-size:12.8px"></div><p style=3D"font-size:12.8px"></p><p style=3D"f=
ont-size:12.8px"></p><div><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 IF NO, then what is the reasoning behind=
not having the controlled re-routing in M3UA/</span><span class=3D"gmail-i=
l" style=3D"font-size:12.8px">SIGTRAN</span><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px=
">? Is it so that we don=E2=80=99t need such procedures in IP world and wha=
t is the reason for it?</span></div><div>+++++++++++++++++++</div><div><br>=
</div><div>Regards,</div><div>Pradeep Kumar=C2=A0</div></div><div class=3D"=
gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:33 PM=
, Pradeep Kumar <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:pradeepkumar143@gma=
il.com" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>></span> wrote:<b=
r><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:=
1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><p>Hi,</p><div></div><p><=
/p>
<p></p><div>=C2=A0</div><p></p>
<p>I had an query regarding the sequence message delivery
functionality in M3UA layer. </p><div></div><p></p>
<p></p><div>=C2=A0</div><p></p>
<p>As in the SS7/MTP3 layer there is concept of the controlled
re-routing in case of links status un-availability, the controlled re-routi=
ng
buffer and its time controlled procedure ensures that that are messages are
delivered in-sequence.=C2=A0 As explained in the RFC section 8.1.1 of
T-REC-Q704 as :</p><div></div><p></p>
<p><i>=E2=80=9C</i><b><i><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;font-family:"ti=
mes new roman",serif">8.1.1 </span></i></b><i><span style=3D"font-size=
:12pt;font-family:"times new roman",serif">The objective of
the controlled rerouting procedure is to restore the optimal signalling</sp=
an></i></p><div></div><p></p>
<p><i><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;font-family:"times new roman"=
,serif">routing and to minimize mis-sequencing of
messages. Therefore, controlled rerouting includes a</span></i></p><div></d=
iv><p></p>
<p><i><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;font-family:"times new roman"=
,serif">time-controlled
traffic diversion procedure,</span>=E2=80=9D </i></p><div></div><p></p>
<p></p><div>=C2=A0</div><p></p>
<p>Now in case of M3UA the same situation can occur, so do we
have an similar functionality of controlled re-routing available in
M3UA/Sigtran as well?=C2=A0=C2=A0 </p><div></div><p></p>
<p style=3D"text-indent:0.5in">If yes please mentioned the RFC
section(I could not find any reference in RFC on this topic). ?</p><div></d=
iv><p></p>
<p></p><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 IF NO, then wh=
at is the reasoning behind not having the controlled re-routing
in M3UA/SIGTRAN? Is it so that we don=E2=80=99t need such procedures in IP =
world and
what is the reason for it?</div><div></div><p></p>
<p><span style=3D"color:rgb(31,73,125)">=C2=A0</span></p>
<p><span style=3D"color:rgb(31,73,125)">=C2=A0</span></p>
<p><span style=3D"color:rgb(31,73,125)">Best Regards,</span></p><div></div>=
<p></p>
<p><span style=3D"color:rgb(31,73,125)">Pradeep Kumar</span></p><div></div>=
<p></p>
<p style=3D"margin-top:7.5pt;line-height:12pt"><i><span style=3D"font-size:=
12pt;font-family:helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,112,192)">=E2=80=9CThe
world needs HQ (Humanity quotient) more than IQ.=E2=80=9D</span></i></p><di=
v></div><p></p></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a11c03308d398bf0538aeaea1--
--===============0640417308446923132==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
--===============0640417308446923132==--