Re: Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tolga, Tolga Asveren wrote: (Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:50:19) > BTW, I just rechecked RFC3332 and it talks about sending SCON from ASP to SG > is allowed if M3UA layer at ASP or ASP itself is congested. As far as I > remember the goal was to cover just the M3UA congestion at ASP -because it > performs certain MTP3 functionality when ASP and SG PCs are different-. > Basically, I am a bit confused myself right now. Does anybody know the > rationale behind sending SCON from ASP to SG when ASP -not the M3UA layer of > ASP but something else- is congested? To be precise, it should be as a result of "congestion of the Signalling Message Handling function within M3UA at the ASP": congestion of the SMH function being the only reason for sending so-called "nodal TFC". --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/