RE: Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB024FA52D@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
Brian, If we have a single SUA SG, and the AS's register for just SSN, or perhaps SSN and a single GT (or range of GTs), why do we need to specify the PC? There are some network architectures that Do Not require your ASP have knowledge of point code. This knowledge is additional and unnecessary provisioning that operators want to avoid. Regards, Linconl -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:01 PM To: Haresign Lincoln Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON Lincoln, Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:52:25) > > I'm not sure what you mean by "MUST be included in the source and > destination addresses of the Registration Request". Are you referring > to the PC? Can you please point out where in the SUA RFC it indicates > this? I couldn't find it. I am proposing that it be included in the I-G because the SG cannot route messages without it. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/