RE: Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON

"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Message-ID <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB024FA52D@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com>
Brian,

If we have a single SUA SG, and the AS's register for just SSN, or
perhaps SSN and a single GT (or range of GTs), why do we need to specify
the PC?

There are some network architectures that Do Not require your ASP have
knowledge of point code.  This knowledge is additional and unnecessary
provisioning that operators want to avoid.

Regards,
Linconl

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:01 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON

Lincoln,

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                        (Tue, 11 Oct 2005
13:52:25)
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean by "MUST be included in the source and 
> destination addresses of the Registration Request".  Are you referring

> to the PC?  Can you please point out where in the SUA RFC it indicates

> this?  I couldn't find it.

I am proposing that it be included in the I-G because the SG cannot
route messages without it.

--brian

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.