Re: Congestion in M3UA/SUA and the use of the SCON

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Haresign,

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                                                            (Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:16:10)
> Brian,
> 
> If we have a single SUA SG, and the AS's register for just SSN, or
> perhaps SSN and a single GT (or range of GTs), why do we need to specify
> the PC?

To keep messages sent to the same subsystem number from being looped back.

Also so that SG knows what point code to put in the OPC field of
outgoing SCCP messages (because your SCCP-User does not know its own
point code and will obviously therefore not include it in the source
address parameter in messages sent to the SG.)

Also, so that the SG can perform proper SCCP management (management of the
SCCP-SAPs, which contain MTP-SAPs, which contain point codes).

> 
> There are some network architectures that Do Not require your ASP have
> knowledge of point code.  This knowledge is additional and unnecessary
> provisioning that operators want to avoid.

Managing and provisioning Global Titles and translation types is more
problematic than Point Codes.

--brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.