RE: Recommendation for SUA modifications

Brian,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Brian F. G. Bidulock
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 2:43 PM
> To: Tolga Asveren
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications
>
>
> Tolga,
>
> Tolga Asveren wrote:
>                    (Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:02:19)
> > > Please bear in mind that an ASP is not restricted to sending messages
> > > from the source address that it has registered to receive messages.
> > > For example, if ASP A registers AS 1 with Routing key PC 111
> and SSN 5,
> > > obtaining RC 1, it is permitted to send messages with source address
> > > PC 333 SSN 7 labelled with RC 1.  There is no restriction in
> the ASP->SG
> > > direction for SCON either.
> > [TOLGA]I have a different opinion here based on 4.3.4.3 ASP Active
> > Procedures section.
> > "The ASP SHOULD NOT send Data or SSNM
> > messages for the related Routing Context(s) before receiving an ASP
> > Active Ack message, or it will risk message loss."
> > I know it is not a "MUST NOT" but still it is nota good thing
> to do unless
> > one is aware of consequences and happy with them.
>
> That would be sending messages with RC 1 in them before receiving
> ASP Active
> Ack for RC 1.  That passage does not speak to the addressing of
> the messages.
> Other passages do.  The SG provides uniform connectivity to all
> ASPs in an AS
> and can route any messagew within a Network Appearance.
[TOLGA]Here I still think different, i.e. I consider AS state to be honored
in both directions of message flow based on the above passage-.
>
> --brian
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>