Hi all,
>I don't see why SUA should be any different. I can't speak
>for the other authors, but when we wrote the SUA RFC, I never
>considered that an ASP or SG would ever not include a point
>code in an address.
>
>Making the point codes mandatory in address fields for all SUA
>messages better promotes interoperability in all
>configurations, and the miniscule expense of causing an ASP to
>provision a single point code for an SG with only a single point code.
Just as background - there were some discussions that ASPs might not
have Point Codes, but some other work to really enable ASPs to funtion
properly without Point Codes never really materialized. I think some
additional work would be needed to make this usable. SGs were always
considered to have Point Codes, in my opinion.
John
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.