RE: Recommendation for SUA modifications
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB02544622@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
Brian, SCCP can send GT in both called and calling address. As a matter of fact, we do this as a requirement in some of our networks. I was just looking at a trace today from a network the Czech Republic that had this. Where in the specification does it say you can't do this? Currently, SUA does not support my scenario. However, my solution (optionally send RC) solves my problem and it does not prevent you from solving the other problems. I have proposed a solution that closes a hole in the spec. Regards, Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:38 PM To: Haresign Lincoln Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications Haresign, Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:32:38) > Brian, > > First of all, perhaps I'm not trying to solve the problem of an SG > with multiple point codes. SUA must support all these scenarios, not just yours. > > Second of all, if the SG has multiple point codes, and the ASP sends a > message with GT in the source and destination address, how does the SG > know which point code to use? If you can answer that, then you can > answer your question below. SCCP nevers sends GT in both addresses. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/