Re: Recommendation for SUA modifications

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Haresign,

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                                                           (Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:37:06)
> 
> Perhaps you have a different version of Q.771 then I do.  I guess I
> don't see anything in this document that requires the TC user to have
> knowledge of a point code.  And we have deployed applications with TC
> users that have no knowledge of point code.  

Yes, and from what I understand, applications that ignore N-PCSTATE
indications contrary to SCCP and TCAP standards.

I find it interesting that you ignore on the one SCCP-User the very
N-PCSTATE indication that you are demanding that you generate without
providing a point code from the other SCCP-User.

On the one hand you say that you ignore the N-PCSTATE because it is
"meaningless" and you don't want to track the point codes it contains,
yet on the other end you want to generate one without specifying a
point code.

I have no doubt that you have deployed such ASPs without point codes.
And I'm sure you are exepriencing problems because of it.

Start by observing the SS7 standards, assign point codes (MTP-SAP) at
your SCCP and SCCP-Users, process received N-PCSTATE indications, and
your problems will go away.

SS7 SCCP does not save you the task of assigning point codes: do not
expect SUA to relieve you of what you indicate as such a great burden.

--brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.