Re: Recommendation for SUA modifications
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Haresign, Its just not done. --brian Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:43:15) > Brian, > > SCCP can send GT in both called and calling address. As a matter of > fact, we do this as a requirement in some of our networks. I was just > looking at a trace today from a network the Czech Republic that had > this. Where in the specification does it say you can't do this? > > Currently, SUA does not support my scenario. However, my solution > (optionally send RC) solves my problem and it does not prevent you from > solving the other problems. I have proposed a solution that closes a > hole in the spec. > > Regards, > Lincoln > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:38 PM > To: Haresign Lincoln > Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications > > Haresign, > > Haresign Lincoln wrote: > (Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:32:38) > > Brian, > > > > First of all, perhaps I'm not trying to solve the problem of an SG > > with multiple point codes. > > SUA must support all these scenarios, not just yours. > > > > > Second of all, if the SG has multiple point codes, and the ASP sends a > > > message with GT in the source and destination address, how does the SG > > > know which point code to use? If you can answer that, then you can > > answer your question below. > > SCCP nevers sends GT in both addresses. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/