Re: Recommendation for SUA modifications

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:59:57 -0600

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization	http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Haresign,

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                                                           (Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:52:01)
> Brian,
> 
> There are some applications that do not need to process an N-PCSTATE
> indication and they will work perfectly fine in the networks.  We are
> experiencing no problems at all.  If you really want me to give you a
> real example of an application that works without PCs, I can.

But this is the very indication that you are attempting to generate
by sending SCON from an ASP to an SG.  You are going to ignore it at
the other end.

> 
> Again, I'm am NOT trying to demand that anyone generates an N-PCSTATE
> message.  I'm trying to use the SCON as described in the RFC today.  I
> want to indicate CONGESTION at an ASP (as described in the RFC).  

And the SG will what?  Generate an N-PCSTATE at the remote that you ignore.

--brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/