RE: Recommendation for SUA modifications

Brian,

It is done.  I'm afraid you are mistaken.  You are now denying reality.

Lincoln 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:58 PM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications

Haresign,

Its just not done.

--brian

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                       (Thu, 13 Oct 2005
13:43:15)
> Brian,
> 
> SCCP can send GT in both called and calling address.  As a matter of 
> fact, we do this as a requirement in some of our networks.  I was just

> looking at a trace today from a network the Czech Republic that had 
> this.  Where in the specification does it say you can't do this?
> 
> Currently, SUA does not support my scenario.  However, my solution 
> (optionally send RC) solves my problem and it does not prevent you 
> from solving the other problems.  I have proposed a solution that 
> closes a hole in the spec.
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:38 PM
> To: Haresign Lincoln
> Cc: Tolga Asveren; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications
> 
> Haresign,
> 
> Haresign Lincoln wrote:
> (Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:32:38)
> > Brian,
> > 
> > First of all, perhaps I'm not trying to solve the problem of an SG 
> > with multiple point codes.
> 
> SUA must support all these scenarios, not just yours.
> 
> > 
> > Second of all, if the SG has multiple point codes, and the ASP sends

> > a
> 
> > message with GT in the source and destination address, how does the 
> > SG
> 
> > know which point code to use?  If you can answer that, then you can 
> > answer your question below.
> 
> SCCP nevers sends GT in both addresses.
> 
> --brian
> 
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/