Re: Recommendation for SUA modifications

Lincoln,

It is a far more minor matter for you to allocate a point code.

That requires no changes to the specification and it is something
that you can do to stop further taking up the WG's time.

--brian

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                   (Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:05:16)
> Brian,
> 
> I fail to see why you are so opposed to making the affected PC OPTIONAL
> (or conditional) in the ASP->SG direction.  People make changes and
> improvements to the M3UA and SUA specifications.  Nobody has given a
> single good reason why this should not be changed.  I seem to have the
> support of Tolga (Ulticom) and I believe I have the support of Barry
> (Adax).  I'm not completely clear on where John (Nokia) stands.
> 
> I have given several reason where this might be useful.  This is such a
> minor change that would enable some very interesting functionality in
> the SG if developers wanted to use it and eliminate the need to do
> unnecessary provisioning on the ASP.
> 
> Really, this is minor.  Please specify why you are so opposed to this
> minor change.
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/