RE: Recommendation for SUA modifications

Brian,

That's your definition.  The RFC says otherwise.

An ASP can congest according to the RFC and according to practical
matters in networks.  We need a mechanism to support ASP congestion.
The RFC has specified one.  A minor change to the RFC allows the cases
that the current RFC has not covered.

And it has no impact on existing SGs since the handling of an SCON is
optional.  

Regards,
Lincoln


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:28 AM
To: Haresign Lincoln
Cc: Valerie Gastaud; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Recommendation for SUA modifications

Lincoln,

The congestion level only applies to a single point code.  SCCP
maintains a independent congestion level for each point code.

--brian

Haresign Lincoln wrote:                        (Fri, 14 Oct 2005
08:19:02)
> Valerie,
> 
> I think this is a good solution.  Using the RC also addresses the 
> scenario of the ASP supporting multiple point codes (not something 
> that we do, but the RFC supports it).  Since the current SCON message 
> doesn't indicate that multiple point codes can be specified in the 
> SCON, the RC parameter would handle this scenario also.
> 
> Regards,
> Lincoln
> 

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/

______________________________________________________________________
  This email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-Secure and has
been found clean.