Re: Recommendation for SUA modifications

Samuel,

I see what you mean: the existing congestion procedures of all MTP-Users
are woefully inadequate.  We must enhance them.  The nice thing about these
two new ASPTM messages is that, because they only use Routing Context, they
are equally applicable to M3UA.  We can even add M2UA, DUA, V5UA and IAU
too.  They also have woefully inadequate upper layer congestion mechanisms.

Perhaps you could help with defining how the ASP Congestion parameter is
different for M3UA, how it differs from MTP Congestion and MTP-User part
specific congestion mechansims, detection and procedures for responding
to the ASP Status indications?

--brian

Samuel Dur D. Jeyaseelan wrote:                  (Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:48:11)
> 
> Sigtran,
>   M3UA rfc also has the same 'congestion' problem, will it be modified as
> per this thread ?
> 
> --Samuel  
>   Alcatel USA, Inc.                  Internet: <userid>@ssd.usa.alcatel.com
>   1000 Coit Road, Plano, Texas 75075
>   ******* The opinions expressed are not those of Alcatel USA, Inc. *******
> 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/