Re: Recommendation for SUA modifications
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Haresign, Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:55:36) > Brian, > > I would recommend leaving the RC in. Otherwise how would the SG > identify which ASP this is? Oh. ASP Id. We should put ASP Id in the message so that we can identify the ASP. > > I would recommend leaving congestion as mandatory to make this similar > to the congestion level field in the SCON today. Perhaps we can even > use the same tag value. No, we will use a new tag value because it is a completely different parameter. The Congestion Level parameter only has those few congestion levels (4 for MTP, 8 for SCCP) and we will probably need way more than those. > > I would recommend an Info field as optional. > > > With regards to ASP congestion, there can be two scenarios. Either the > SUA layer itself is congested or congestion is detected in the direction > of the user (perhaps the queue depth of the application reaches a > specific size). In any case, I would leave this very general as this is > very implementation dependent. Ok a queue to some user, or something within the SUA layer blocks up. Is there a way that we can identify the user in the ASP Status? RC? No, that is too heavily tied to an SS7 routing key. How about a new SUA User Index? --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/