Re: Error code for a specific case in UA
"Sergey Mikhailov" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000d01c5d3c0$3e13be30$730f0f0a@smikhailov> |
Brian, Thank you for this reply. I completely agree with your explanation. Sergey Mikhailov. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> To: "Sergey Mikhailov" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Error code for a specific case in UA > Sergey, > > Yes. Even if a parameter follows the message header, it is not > included in the message length and is therefore not really part > of the message, is it? If the message requires a parameter, > then "Missing Parameter" sounds reasonable to me. > > --brian > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Sergey Mikhailov wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Let's suppose a message with at least one mandatory parameter is >> received. But the message has Length = 8 in common message header. >> >> >> >> What error code must be specified in ERROR message to be sent in >> response? >> >> Is "Missing Parameter" the correct code for this case? >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Sergey Mikhailov. > >> _______________________________________________ >> Sigtran mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ > [email protected] ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ > http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ > ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ > ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ >