Re: RE: draft-bidulock-sigtran-tua-04.txt

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:33:04 -0600

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.sigtran
Organization	http://www.openss7.org/
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Tolga,

Tolga Asveren wrote:                                                                 (Mon, 24 Oct 2005 08:04:55)
> >
> > I can't speak to your hypothetical protocol, because it is not
> > defined, but as regards "what can TUA do that SUA can't?" I pose the
> > question "what can SUA do that M3UA can't", or "what can M3UA do
> > that M2UA can't", or "what can M2UA do that M2PA can't."
> [TOLGA]It does not need to be defined because it is an implementation
> dependent and local procedure -BTW it is not hypothetical-. The point is
> that people can be creative about RK types, there is nothing preventing them
> to do so, as long as they achieve this by using local procedures without
> modifying the SIGTRAN protocol used.
> About necessity of SIGTRAN protocols we have right now, if I had the Occam's
> razor, I could have done some cleaning -one or maybe two-. OTOH, not all of
> them are redundant.

People are also welcome to invent their own protocol.

Did you have any comments on the draft itself?

--brian


-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/