Re: M3UA: 1IPSP - multiple IPSPs traffic flow
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Shashank, > > RFC 3332 says: (Section 4.3.4.3 second paragraph) > > > > For the Application Servers that the ASP can be successfully > > activated, the SGP or IPSP responds with one or more ASP Active Ack > > messages, including the associated Routing Context(s) and reflecting > > any Traffic Mode Type value present in the related ASP Active > > message. The Routing Context parameter MUST be included in the ASP > > Active Ack message(s) if the received ASP Active message contained > > any Routing Contexts. Depending on any Traffic Mode Type request in > > the ASP Active message, or local configuration data if there is no > > request, the SGP moves the ASP to the correct ASP traffic state > > within the associated Application Server(s). Layer Management is > > informed with an M-ASP_Active indication. If the SGP or IPSP receives > > any Data messages before an ASP Active message is received, the SGP > > or IPSP MAY discard them. By sending an ASP Active Ack message, the > > SGP or IPSP is now ready to receive and send traffic for the related > > Routing Context(s). The ASP SHOULD NOT send Data or SSNM messages > > for the related Routing Context(s) before receiving an ASP Active Ack > > message, or it will risk message loss. > > > > I think that this is quite clear with regard to two things: > > > > The IPSP receiving the ASP Active message responds with regard to Traffic > > Mode in the same fashion as an SGP would. Prasad, Shashank S (Shashank) wrote: (Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:17:59) > Brian, > I have only IPSPs in peer to peer communication. > There are no SGs. And therefore I would NOT consider SGPs or their > equivalent functionality. > > Ur answer tends me to believe that the Single Exchange is ONLY between an > ASP and SGP. > Which is NOT correct. Please refer to Sec 5.5.1 and Sec 5.5.2 in the RFC > 3332. > > I can always have SE between 2 IPSPs. It is upto the IPSPs to exchange the > right parameters in the messages to indicate to each other about > loadsharing. > > > shashank > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/