RE: SE-IPSP definition
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, [..snip..] > > All SSNM messages are applicable to IPSPs. No change is required. [TOLGA]I couldn't disagree more. Could you please tell why they are needed? Availability of remote ends is managed by the state of AS. As far as I can see only SCON has a use case, and hopefully with ASPCONG it won't be necessary as well.