Re: SE-IPSP definition
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tolga, Tolga Asveren wrote: (Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:54:04) > > --X--snip--X-- > > > > It is pedantic because an IPSP does not need an ASP Traffic Mode to be > > redundant. When acting like an SGP, the peer IPSP can distribute > > traffic in accordance with the way that an ASP distributes messages to > > the SGP that make up an SG. The SE-IPSP acting in SGP mode does not > > require an "ASP Traffic Mode". > > > > Traffic Mode (the parameter) is an ASP concept. Is is only useful to an > > SE-IPSP in so much as the SE-IPSP is behaving like an ASP. In SE mode, > > it was never intended that both sides behave like an ASP at the same > > time. That is DE mode. > [TOLGA]SE-IPSP is an IPSP not an ASP not an SGP. For certain message > transactions, it follows the same message sequence but conceptually it is > not equal to ASP not to SGP. So, I 100% agree with Peter, traffic mode is > necessary bothways for SE-IPSP case. Traffic mode is an attribute associated > with application logic and for IPSP case, there is application logic present > at both ends. It is not even necessary that there be application logic present at the IPSP. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/