Re: SUA: Routing Context for CL and CO messages

varadaraj.yatirajula,

Yes, although the parameter supports multiple RCs, CO and CL messages
should only contain one RC.  Another for the IG.

--brian

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, [email protected] wrote:

> 
>    In the SUA RFC, the RC parm in CO and CL messages seems to indicate
> 
>    that  multiple  routing  contexts  values can be present. However this
>    does not look to be
> 
>    correct  as the message should logically be received from or sent to a
>    unique AS (or routing context)
> 
> 
>    Can someone clarify this?
> 
> 
>    From RFC:
> 
> 
>    3.2.1.  Connectionless Data Transfer (CLDT)
> 
> 
>       This message transfers data between one SUA to another.
> 
> 
>        0                   1                   2                   3
> 
>        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
> 
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>       |          Tag = 0x0006         |            Length             |
> 
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>       /                       Routing Context                         /
> 
>       \                                                               \
> 
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran


-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock    ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
[email protected]    ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in  ¦
http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying  to adapt the  world  to himself. ¦
                        ¦ Therefore  all  progress  depends on the ¦
                        ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦