RE: M3UA Deployment Considerations Draft

Well, actually we don't. It is seen as  a last option if nothing else works.
The point mentioning about it was more to emphasize that there are other
solutions to address the discussed problems. OTOH maybe we did not use the
best language to tell this -maybe we should have mentioned only of optional
extensions rather than optional extensions/proprietary extensions-.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Brian F. G. Bidulock
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:06 PM
> To: Tolga Asveren
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA Deployment Considerations Draft
>
>
> Tolga,
>
> You recommend proprietary extensions?
>
> --brian
>
> Tolga Asveren wrote:
>    (Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:54:52)
> > 00 version of M3UA Deployment Considerations draft is now available:
> >
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-asveren-sigtran-m3uacons-00.txt
> >
> > Comments/suggestions are welcome.
> >
> >    Thanks,
> >    Tolga
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>