RE: M3UA Deployment Considerations Draft

Hi Tolga,

This seems like a pretty useful document.  I interpreted your
section on proprietary extensions as just recommending that
they fit into the architecture.  Maybe the title of that section
could be better worded...

Lyndon 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Tolga Asveren
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 11:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Sigtran] M3UA Deployment Considerations Draft

Well, actually we don't. It is seen as  a last option if nothing else
works.
The point mentioning about it was more to emphasize that there are other
solutions to address the discussed problems. OTOH maybe we did not use
the best language to tell this -maybe we should have mentioned only of
optional extensions rather than optional extensions/proprietary
extensions-.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Brian F. G. Bidulock
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:06 PM
> To: Tolga Asveren
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA Deployment Considerations Draft
>
>
> Tolga,
>
> You recommend proprietary extensions?
>
> --brian
>
> Tolga Asveren wrote:
>    (Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:54:52)
> > 00 version of M3UA Deployment Considerations draft is now available:
> >
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-asveren-sigtran-m3uacons-00.
> txt
> >
> > Comments/suggestions are welcome.
> >
> >    Thanks,
> >    Tolga
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>



_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran