Re: Re: Traffic handling modes of SGPs
Ilie Glib <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, I am sorry to bore you with this, and perhaps it does not deserve too much attention, but ASPs which act as clients (according to the RFC they should do so) would never open a listening socket. Therefore SCTP INIT from the SGP will be lost. Thus option 1 cannot be interoperable, but I agree that it can work in case ASPs provide necessary support. It means clients (ASPs) should also listen on the well-known port. > > For active-standby, your second alternative fits me well. > > According to my understanding of SIGTRAN the first option should not > > be possible because SGPs cannot establish associations towards ASPs. > > SGPs can establish associations towards ASPs. > > > > > I interperet your statement > > > > > > Typically, however, SGPs run in loadshare mode, by nature of the design > > > of the SS7 network to which they attach. > > > > as there will be no SGPs that require ASPs to broadcast traffic to all > > SGPs, otherwise I would expect a nomative statement in the RFC, > > requiring it. > > ASPs can be configured to broadcast to SGPs. RFC has no statements about it, has it? (except for the definition of the SGP) Regards Ilie