Re: AS, RK , RC concepts in SE model

Ilie,

If that's the way you want it, I suggest you stick to the DE model.

--brian

Ilie Glib wrote:                            (Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:09:30)
> Hello Brian,
> 
> in my view this is a considerable change of AS concept. In SIGTRAN an
> AS is an application server sitting behind its ASPs/IPSPs. Now you say
> an AS is a bidirectional signalling relation and not an Application
> Server.
> 
> The same goes for RK,  RK1 cannot be the same as RK2, because Routing
> Key defines where messages go, it defines routing.
> 
> In my view the concept of Application Server cannot be dependent on
> the exchange model used. How can we make the main SIGTRAN concept
> dependent on the communication model?
> 
> Any other opinions?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Ilie
> 
> On 12/6/05, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Ilie,
> >
> > For SE AS1==AS2 (and RK1==RK2).
> >
> > For DE AS1!=AS2 (and RK1!=RK2).
> >
> > You need double the AS, RC and RKs in DE as you do in SE.
> >
> > Because they can't relay, IPSPs only need 1 AS betwixt them.
> >
> > --brian
> >

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/