RE: AS concepts and Relay in SUA and M3UA
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hmmm, for remote relaying -which I was referring as "relaying" till now-, I
personally disagree that it is to be supported by SUA IPSP, it is against
the definition of IPSP add such a configuration should be provided by SUA
relaying. I consider SUA relaying equivalent to SUA SG-SG but I don't know
whether everybody will buy that point.
In any case, I believe the thing to do is to define SUA Relaying and SUA
IPSP functionality -at least what they do provide and do not provide-, in a
document. Probably IG is a good place for that(?).
I think, before another long thread starts, it could be a good idea to hear
from the authors of SUA (John) and of SUA IG (Lode) -and from others as
well-, what they have to say about this issue.
Thanks,
Tolga
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Brian F. G. Bidulock
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 3:19 PM
> To: Tolga Asveren
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] AS concepts and Relay in SUA and M3UA
>
>
> Tolga,
>
> Tolga Asveren wrote:
> (Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:23:33)
> > [TOLGA]Do you mean relaying between two local SCCP-Users?
>
> Local and remote.
>
> --brian
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email protected]
> http://www.openss7.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
>