Re: ASP Capabilities value 0x2 of interworking field
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tolga, Tolga Asveren wrote: (Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:08:36) > > > > No, not all SUA SGPs host applications. Just as not all STPs > > support SCCP users. > [TOLGA]The point is that they *CAN*, and I think you agree with this. I am > not saying that all SUA entities MUST host local applications but they are > able to do so. Theoretically maybe, in practice they don't. > > > > No, not all SUA SGPs support relaying. Just as not all STPs act > > as an SCCP relay. > [TOLGA]Again the point is that they are able to do so based on the > specification. Again, in practice they don't. SCCP relay points are normally interior to a network, not at the edge. > > > > You are still thinking MTP. Consider that you have an all-IP network with > > not SS7 network interworking from the perspective of SCCP and SUA: Where > > are you going to place your GTT so that you can administrate your network? > [TOLGA]SGPs. Placing GTT at the edge of the network is not practical. > > > > Your first diagram would restrict GTT to be located at a node > > supporting SS7 > > network interworking, the SGP. In an all-IP network there is no > > need for an > > SGP, so that configuration is too restrictive. > [TOLGA]A SGP does not need to have SS7 interface. You put it there, if you > need to acces conventional SS7 network. So in M3UA what is an SGP with no SS7 interface? An IPSP that supports relaying? > > > > What SUA does is permit the relaying capability to be added to any node in > > the network (including ASP2 in your diagram below), allowing > > flexible placement > > of the GTT function within the SUA network. > [TOLGA]I am not sure that it is just GTT based routing. It seems that 1.4.6 > is speaking of pure PC+SSN based relaying as well -where a node receives a > message with destination address PC+SSN and relays it-. That's why we called it AMF instead of GTT. But AMF serves the same role as GTT and GTT can in fact be the implementation of the AMF. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/