Re: AS concepts and Relay in SUA and M3UA
Ilie Glib <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, to conclude it, and make the conclusion visible and agreed. There is a 1:1 relationship between a Routing Context value and a traffic flow, corresponding to a Routing Key, within an association between two Signalling Processes. The scope of uniqueness for Routing Context values is limited by the association between two Signalling Processes. The RC values may be assigned independently for any two associations hold by a Signalling Process. Is this OK with everybody on SIGTRAN list? Does anybody have objections? Ilie On 12/20/05, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > Ilie, > > Because it is largely an operational consideration. Operational > considerations were removed and placed in a non-normative appendix > (for both documents). > > -brian > > Ilie Glib wrote: (Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:58:07) > > Brian, > > > > well, why RFC does not crarify it? > > > > Ilie > > > > On 12/20/05, Brian F. G. Bidulock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ilie, > > > > > > It does not say that the SGP cannot have a different AS Table per > > > association. > > > > > > --brian > > > > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > [email protected] > http://www.openss7.org/ > -- Ilie